Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTINEZ v. DUCART, 5:15-cv-04849-BLF (PR). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160112928 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that Respondent may have until March 7, 2016, to file the answer to the application for writ of habeas corpus. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent's counsel within thirty (30) days of the date the answer is filed. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, a
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that Respondent may have until March 7, 2016, to file the answer to the application for writ of habeas corpus. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent's counsel within thirty (30) days of the date the answer is filed.

Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty (30) days of the date the motion is filed, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days of the date any opposition is filed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer