Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (for plaintiffs Karen Baker, David Balmer and Patrick Kelly only) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . TO: THE COURT; and TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by Plaintiffs, KAREN BAKER, DAVID BALMER, AND PATRICK KELLY, and Defendant, NESTL PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, by and through their respective counsel, that this Court dismiss all claims asserted by Plaintiffs, KAREN BAKER, DAVID BALMER,
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (for plaintiffs Karen Baker, David Balmer and Patrick Kelly only) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . TO: THE COURT; and TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by Plaintiffs, KAREN BAKER, DAVID BALMER, AND PATRICK KELLY, and Defendant, NESTL PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, by and through their respective counsel, that this Court dismiss all claims asserted by Plaintiffs, KAREN BAKER, DAVID BALMER, A..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (for plaintiffs Karen Baker, David Balmer and Patrick Kelly only)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
TO: THE COURT; and
TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by Plaintiffs, KAREN BAKER, DAVID BALMER, AND PATRICK KELLY, and Defendant, NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, by and through their respective counsel, that this Court dismiss all claims asserted by Plaintiffs, KAREN BAKER, DAVID BALMER, AND PATRICK KELLY against Defendant, NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, with prejudice, pursuant to 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
STIPULATED TO, DATED, AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 11th day of January, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
