Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HOLLAND v. THE RELATED COMPANIES, INC., 4:15-CV-03220 JSW. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160115q39 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES SET IN OCTOBER 2, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (DKT. NO. 45) AS MODIFIED HEREIN JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . By and through their attorneys of record, Defendants THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES, LLC and RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P. ( incorrectly sued as The Related Companies, Inc. ) ("Defendants") and Plaintiffs PETER HOLLAND and KRISTIN HOLLAND ("Plaintiffs") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, the Court entere
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES SET IN OCTOBER 2, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (DKT. NO. 45)

AS MODIFIED HEREIN

By and through their attorneys of record, Defendants THIRD AND MISSION ASSOCIATES, LLC and RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P. (incorrectly sued as The Related Companies, Inc.) ("Defendants") and Plaintiffs PETER HOLLAND and KRISTIN HOLLAND ("Plaintiffs") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court entered a scheduling order on October 2, 2015 (dkt. No. 45) setting case deadlines pursuant to stipulation of the parties;

WHEREAS, the Court approved the substitution of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP in place of Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP as Defendants' counsel of record on December 18, 2015;

WHEREAS, Defendants' new lead counsel, Lyn Agre, represents witnesses in a matter pending before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (United States v. Federal Express Corporation, Case No. 14-CR-380), which is set for trial on July 13, 2016 and expected to last several months;

WHEREAS, Defendants' new counsel and Plaintiffs' counsel have met and conferred, and agree that extension of certain of the deadlines in the current scheduling order is warranted.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto and their respective undersigned attorneys, as follows:

The parties respectfully jointly request that the Court continue the deadlines set forth in the October 2, 2015 Case Management Order as follows:

Discovery Cut-off May 2, 2016 Designation of experts May 2, 2016 Expert discovery cut-off May 31, 2016 Hearing of dispositive motions July 8, 2016 Pretrial conference September 26, 2016 Jury selection & trial October 31, 2016

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the deadlines set forth in the October 2, 2015 Case Management Conference Order are vacated and reset as follows:

Discovery Cut-off May 2, 2016 Designation of experts May 2, 2016 Expert discovery cut-off May 31, 2016 Hearing of dispositive motions July 8, 2016 Pretrial conference September 26, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. Jury selection October 26, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. Jury selection & trial Trial October 31, 2016 at 8:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer