Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

REASE v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 4:15-CV-00927-YGR. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160122709 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL PENDING EFFORTS TOWARD INFORMAL RESOLUTION *AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT* YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order Staying Case and Continuing Compliance Hearing dated November 23, 2015, the parties, plaintiff MAURION REASE, and defendants THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC hereby stipulate that: 1. WHEREAS the Court stayed the case through January 22, 2016 and continued the December 4, 201
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL PENDING EFFORTS TOWARD INFORMAL RESOLUTION

*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*

Pursuant to the Order Staying Case and Continuing Compliance Hearing dated November 23, 2015, the parties, plaintiff MAURION REASE, and defendants THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC hereby stipulate that:

1. WHEREAS the Court stayed the case through January 22, 2016 and continued the December 4, 2015 compliance hearing to January 22, 2016;

2. WHEREAS the Court ordered the parties to file either a stipulated dismissal or a joint comprehensive proposed case schedule by January 15, 2016;

3. WHEREAS the parties have agreed to continue to work diligently in informally settling this dispute by way of a potential short sale;

4. WHEREAS Plaintiff has engaged receiver Patrick Bulmer, appointed in the original action (Alameda County Superior Court Case No.: RG12657382) on August 19, 2015, to obtain the outstanding documents from Deborah Dean to complete a short sale package to submit to Defendants;

5. WHEREAS the parties agree that, in the interest of facilitating settlement of this action, in exchange for a stipulation to not foreclose on the Subject Property and to allow sufficient time to complete and submit the short sale package, the matter shall be dismissed, with prejudice, on April 15, 2016. The parties, therefore, agree as follows:

1. The matter shall be dismissed, with prejudice, on April 15, 2016, to allow for adequate time for Plaintiff to complete preparation of a short sale package and for Defendants to review Plaintiff for a short sale. 2. Defendants agree to not initiate foreclosure proceedings on the Subject Property prior to the April 15 date for dismissal of the matter. 3. The parties agree to continue to work diligently and in good faith to complete the short sale of the Subject Property in the event the short sale is not completed by the April 15, 2016 dismissal date.

ORDER

The Court hereby ADOPTS the foregoing stipulation of the parties as an Order of the Court. The Court further SETS a compliance hearing for April 22, 2016 at 9:01 a.m. in Courtroom 1 of the Federal Courthouse at 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. If by April 15, 2016, neither party has filed an update contesting the status of the settlement, the case shall be deemed DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk shall vacate the compliance hearing and administratively close the case file.

This Order terminates Docket Number 23.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer