POOSHS v. ALTRIA GROUP, INC., C-04-1221 PJH-JCS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160202844
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER ON RJR'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT TO BE PROFFERED WITH DR. CUMMINGS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Defendant's January 25, 2016 submission regarding RJR's objections to Plaintiff's exhibits to be proffered with Dr. Cummings. The Court rules as follows: Exhibit No. Objection(s) Court's Ruling 35 Relevance; Concert of Action Sustained Claim Dismissed (Ruling No. 3 62
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER ON RJR'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT TO BE PROFFERED WITH DR. CUMMINGS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Defendant's January 25, 2016 submission regarding RJR's objections to Plaintiff's exhibits to be proffered with Dr. Cummings. The Court rules as follows: Exhibit No. Objection(s) Court's Ruling 35 Relevance; Concert of Action Sustained Claim Dismissed (Ruling No. 3 62 ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON RJR'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT TO BE PROFFERED WITH DR. CUMMINGS
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Defendant's January 25, 2016 submission regarding RJR's objections to Plaintiff's exhibits to be proffered with Dr. Cummings. The Court rules as follows:
Exhibit No. Objection(s) Court's Ruling
35 Relevance; Concert of Action Sustained
Claim Dismissed (Ruling No. 3
62 Sustained
34 Post-69 Advertising and Promotion Sustained
(Ruling No. 64)
63 Sustained
74 Sustained
161 Sustained
1496 Relevance (non-party inquiry to Sustained
RJR); Unfair Prejudice; Lack of
1787 Nexus Sustained
2033 Sustained
55 Unfair Prejudice; Due Process Sustained
(Right to Defend in Litigation);
77 Ruling No. 28 Sustained
101 Sustained
939 Authenticity Sustained
81 Relevance (non-party document Sustained
authored by H&K); Unfair
88 Prejudice Sustained
173 Sustained
2150 Relevance (internal non-party Sustained
document authored by BAT);
Unfair Prejudice; Design (Ruling
Nos. 6, 74, 86)
85 Hearsay within Hearsay;
Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained
(Ruling Nos. 22, 68, 71)
87 Relevance (internal non-party Sustained
document authored by TI); Unfair
179 Prejudice; Unsegregated Aggregate Sustained
Harm (Ruling Nos. 22, 68, 71)
171 Relevance (document authored by
non-party to non-party); Unfair
Prejudice; Unsegregated Aggregate Sustained
Harm (Ruling Nos. 22, 68, 71)
184 Hearsay within Hearsay;
Unsegregated Aggregate Harm
(Ruling Nos. 22, 68, 71); Evidence Sustained
against non-party manufacturers
(Rulings Nos. 22, 71)
212 Design (Ruling Nos. 6, 74, 86) Overruled
214 Sustained
221 Overruled
IT IS SO ORDERED
Source: Leagle
