Rebucas v. City of San Bruno, 3:14-cv-03313-EMC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160209596
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: WHEREAS, Counsel for plaintiff has a hearing in Santa Clara County on February 18, 2016; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs ANNE REBUCAS, et al, and Defendants CITY OF SAN BRUNO, et al, through their counsel of record, in the interests of judicial economy and justice, all would benefit from a continua
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: WHEREAS, Counsel for plaintiff has a hearing in Santa Clara County on February 18, 2016; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs ANNE REBUCAS, et al, and Defendants CITY OF SAN BRUNO, et al, through their counsel of record, in the interests of judicial economy and justice, all would benefit from a continuan..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
WHEREAS, Counsel for plaintiff has a hearing in Santa Clara County on February 18, 2016;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs ANNE REBUCAS, et al, and Defendants CITY OF SAN BRUNO, et al, through their counsel of record, in the interests of judicial economy and justice, all would benefit from a continuance of the Further Case Management Conference presently set for February 18, 2016 to March 3, 2016.
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the case management conference in this matter has been continued to March 3, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
