Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KALK v. 1st DISCOUNT BROKERAGE, INC., 3:15-cv-04950-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160209725 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO TO DISMISS AND MOTION STRIKE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Yulia Kalk ("Kalk" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant/Counterclaimant 1st Discount Brokerage ("1DB" or "Defendant") (Kalk and 1DB shall be referred to collectively as the "Parties"). WHEREAS, on December 22, 2015, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant filed a Motion to Di
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO TO DISMISS AND MOTION STRIKE

This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Yulia Kalk ("Kalk" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant/Counterclaimant 1st Discount Brokerage ("1DB" or "Defendant") (Kalk and 1DB shall be referred to collectively as the "Parties").

WHEREAS, on December 22, 2015, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. The hearing on the Motion to Strike and the Motion to Dismiss was initially scheduled for February 3, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred in an attempt to come to a resolution of this matter;

WHEREAS, the Parties thereupon agreed to continue the hearings on the Motions to allow further exploration of settlement and to defer expending resources needed to address the pending Motion to Dismiss and the Motion to Strike;

WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to continue the Motion to Dismiss and the Motion to Strike from February 3, 2016 to March 3, 2016 and this Court entered an Order continuing the hearing to March 3, 2016 (Dkt. 22) to finalize a potential resolution of this matter; and

WHEREAS, the Parties have tentatively come to an agreement to resolve the entire dispute and are currently circulating settlement documents;

WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's earlier Order (Dkt 22) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Yulia Kalk Reply Memorandum is due February 3, 2016; and

WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy and avoiding the expenditure of potentially unnecessary fees and costs the Parties have agreed that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Yulia Kalk shall have until February 11, 2016 within which to file any Reply Memorandum in the event that the settlement is not finalized by that time.

Accordingly, the Parties further stipulate and agree that any Reply be filed on or before

ORDER

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause showing,

IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike remain on March 3, 2016. It is further ordered that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant has until February 11, 2016 within which to submit a Reply Memorandum regarding the Motion to Dismiss and the Motion to Strike.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Rod Divelbiss, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this document. I hereby attest that Andrew R. Kislik has concurred in this filing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer