Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION v. ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 15-cv-00754-WHO. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160219852 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . STIPULATION On December 21, 2015, the Court extended the deadline for the parties to amend their pleadings to March 31, 2016 based on the parties' stipulation (Dkt. No. 45). Plaintiff whiteCryption Corporation ("whiteCryption") seeks to file a first amended complaint in the redacted form attached hereto as Exhibit A with an unredacted version lodged fol
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

On December 21, 2015, the Court extended the deadline for the parties to amend their pleadings to March 31, 2016 based on the parties' stipulation (Dkt. No. 45).

Plaintiff whiteCryption Corporation ("whiteCryption") seeks to file a first amended complaint in the redacted form attached hereto as Exhibit A with an unredacted version lodged following Local Rule 79-5. Defendant and Counter-Claimant Arxan Technologies, Inc. ("Arxan") consents, pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to whiteCryption filing its first amended complaint without waiving any right to challenge the sufficiency of the first amended complaint in response thereto. whiteCryption, Counter-Defendant Intertrust Technologies Corp. ("Intertrust") and Arxan (collectively the "Parties") agree that good cause exists for whiteCryption to file its first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Arxan intends to file a motion for leave to file a first amended counterclaim within the deadlines imposed by the Court's scheduling order (Dkt. No. 45). whiteCryption and Intertrust will not oppose a timely filed motion by Arxan for leave to file a first amended counterclaim without waiving any right to challenge the sufficiency of the first amended counterclaim in response thereto.

ORDER

Based upon the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that whiteCryption is GRANTED leave to file its First Amended Complaint in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Further, whiteCryption's First Amended Complaint is deemed filed as of the date of this Order. The Parties will comply with Local Rule 79-5 regarding redactions and sealing requests. Arxan's response to the First Amended Complaint is due 14 days from the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer