Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Amador, CR 08-00717 MMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160229738 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PENDING SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION PROCEEDINGS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , Senior District Judge . Defendant Jose Gustavo Amador, by his counsel Martha Boersch, and the United States Attorney, by its counsel Assistant U.S. Attorney Lloyd A. Farnham, hereby stipulate and agree that the March 2, 2016 hearing on the Form 12 violations should be taken off calendar and that no further action on the Form 12 is necessary at this time. For the reasons stated b
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PENDING SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION PROCEEDINGS

Defendant Jose Gustavo Amador, by his counsel Martha Boersch, and the United States Attorney, by its counsel Assistant U.S. Attorney Lloyd A. Farnham, hereby stipulate and agree that the March 2, 2016 hearing on the Form 12 violations should be taken off calendar and that no further action on the Form 12 is necessary at this time. For the reasons stated below, the parties request that the Court take judicial notice of the allegations contained in the pending Form 12 Petition. Counsel for the defendant has conferred with United States Probation Officer Octavio Magana, and he agrees that judicial notice is appropriate and that no further proceedings are necessary at this time.

The grounds for this stipulation are as follows:

1. On June 29, 2015, Officer Magana filed a Form 12 (Dkt. No 57) alleging that the defendant had violated the terms of his supervised release by consuming alcohol and incurring an arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol, and for failing to promptly notify Officer Magana that he had moved out of the residence he shared with his girlfriend after a fight.

2. Since the filing of the Form 12, Mr. Amador has complied with the conditions of his release and Mr. Amador's California State driving under the influence charge has been resolved.

3. The parties stipulate that the Court should take judicial notice of the violations identified in the Form 12, Dkt. No. 57.

4. The parties stipulate to take the March 2, 2016 hearing on the Form 12 violations off calendar and agree that no further action relating to the Form 12 violations is necessary at this time.

[PROPOSED ORDER ]

Based on the stipulation between the parties in this case, IT IS ORDERED that the March 2, 2016 hearing on the Form 12 violations be taken off calendar and no further action on the Form 12 is necessary at this time.

The Court hereby takes judicial notice of the allegations in the pending Form 12, filed in this matter on June 29, 2015. The defendant will remain on supervised release under the conditions previously imposed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer