Filed: Mar. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [CIVIL L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), 7-12] MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12, Plaintiff YUIRY ANAKIN, by and through his attorney of record, Mark W. Kelsey, and Defendants CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and DEPUTY W. ARMSTRONG ("Defendants"), by and through their attorney of record, Deputy County Counsel Nima E. Sohi of the Contra Costa County Counsel's Office, here
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [CIVIL L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), 7-12] MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12, Plaintiff YUIRY ANAKIN, by and through his attorney of record, Mark W. Kelsey, and Defendants CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and DEPUTY W. ARMSTRONG ("Defendants"), by and through their attorney of record, Deputy County Counsel Nima E. Sohi of the Contra Costa County Counsel's Office, hereb..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[CIVIL L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), 7-12]
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12, Plaintiff YUIRY ANAKIN, by and through his attorney of record, Mark W. Kelsey, and Defendants CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and DEPUTY W. ARMSTRONG ("Defendants"), by and through their attorney of record, Deputy County Counsel Nima E. Sohi of the Contra Costa County Counsel's Office, hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Plaintiff YUIRY ANAKIN to file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed on February 19, 2016 (ECF Doc. No. 11).
RECITALS
1. On January 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983. See CF Doc. No. 1.
2. On February 2, 2016, a stipulation to extend time for Defendants to respond to the complaint was filed by Plaintiff at Defendants' request. See CF Doc. No. 9.
3. On February 19, 2016, Defendants Contra Costa County (sued as Contra Costa Regional Medical Center) and Deputy W. Armstrong filed a Motion to Dismiss All Claims pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), and a Motion to Strike pursuant to FRCP 12(f). See ECF Doc. No. 11.
4. Pursuant to this Court's local rules, the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss is March 4, 2016.
5. Defendants noticed the date for Hearing on the Motion to Dismiss for March 31, 2016; the undersigned parties agree that this date should not be affected by the instant stipulation.
6. This Court's Initial Case Management Scheduling Order set the date for the initial case management conference on April 21, 2016; the undersigned parties agree that this date should not be affected by the instant stipulation. See ECF Doc. No. 4.
STIPULATION
The undersigned parties hereby agree and stipulate that the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 11) should be extended by one week to March 11, 2016, and that Defendants' time to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Response should accordingly be extended by one week, to March 18, 2016. Hearing on the Motion shall proceed as scheduled on March 31, 2016. April 7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The hearing on the Motion is extended to April 7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
