Filed: Mar. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Rombauer Family Partnership II, L.P. and Rombauer Vineyards, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Lloyd Cellars, Inc., ("Defendant Lloyd Cellars"), through their designated counsel that: 1. Plaintiffs and Defendant Lloyd Cellars have entered into a Settlement Agreement that resolves the disputes between the parties and provides that this court wi
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Rombauer Family Partnership II, L.P. and Rombauer Vineyards, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Lloyd Cellars, Inc., ("Defendant Lloyd Cellars"), through their designated counsel that: 1. Plaintiffs and Defendant Lloyd Cellars have entered into a Settlement Agreement that resolves the disputes between the parties and provides that this court wil..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Rombauer Family Partnership II, L.P. and Rombauer Vineyards, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Lloyd Cellars, Inc., ("Defendant Lloyd Cellars"), through their designated counsel that:
1. Plaintiffs and Defendant Lloyd Cellars have entered into a Settlement Agreement that resolves the disputes between the parties and provides that this court will retain jurisdiction over the parties to this stipulation in the event of a dispute arising out of or relating to Section 2.0 or 5.0 of the Settlement Agreement.
2. The Honorable Richard Seeborg of this Court, and in the event of his unavailability, a judge appointed by the Chief Judge, retains continuing jurisdiction over the parties for the sole purpose of resolving and adjudicating all disputes arising out of or relating to any provision of Section 2.0 and 5.0 in the Settlement Agreement.
3. The above referenced terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement may be enforced in the future through proceedings filed directly with this Court before Judge Seeborg, or in the event of his unavailability, a judge appointed pursuant to paragraph 2 above.
4. Subject to the above provisions, and pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the present action is dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
