Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TSYN v. WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC, 14-cv-02552-LB. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160325e47 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULES LAUREL BEELER , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Interlocutory Appeal (ECF No. 106), currently set for hearing before this Court on April 14, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.; WHEREAS, Defendant's response to that motion is currently due on March 23, 2016, and Plaintiffs' reply on March 30, 2016; WHEREAS, per the agreement of the parties, the Court continued to April 7, 2016 the deadline f
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULES

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Interlocutory Appeal (ECF No. 106), currently set for hearing before this Court on April 14, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.;

WHEREAS, Defendant's response to that motion is currently due on March 23, 2016, and Plaintiffs' reply on March 30, 2016;

WHEREAS, per the agreement of the parties, the Court continued to April 7, 2016 the deadline for filing motions related to (1) conditional certification under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") of the remaining FLSA claims; and (2) class certification of the California state law claims under Rule 23. The Court did so with the parties' expressed understanding that they would meet and confer on these deadlines following the now-issued ruling on Plaintiffs' initial motion for conditional certification and Defendant's motions for partial summary judgment. (ECF No. 67);

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on the above briefing schedules and have agreed to a briefing and hearing schedule on the pending motion as well as a continuance of provisional deadline for motions concerning conditional and class certification (the parties note their intent to meet and confer further after resolution of the pending Motion for Interlocutory Appeal);

WHEREAS, the Parties jointly and respectfully submit that it would best promote judicial and party resources to modify and reset these pending deadlines;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the respective Parties hereto, that: Subject to the approval of the Court, the deadlines in this matter be modified and set as follows:

Case Event Current Filing Proposed Extended Filing Deadline/Hearing Date Deadline/Hearing Date Deadline to File 3/23/16 3/31/16 Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Deadline to File Reply 3/30/16 4/14/16 ISO Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Hearing on Motion for 4/14/16 4/28/16 Interlocutory Appeal Deadline for Filing 4/7/16 6/23/16 Motions for Conditional Certification and Rule 23 Class Certification

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories listed above.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties' Joint Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the case deadlines in this matter be modified as follows:

Case Event Current Filing Proposed Extended Filing Deadline/Hearing Date Deadline/Hearing Date Deadline to File 3/23/16 3/31/16 Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Deadline to File Reply 3/30/16 4/14/16 ISO Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Hearing on Motion for 4/14/16 4/28/16 Interlocutory Appeal Filing of Motions re: 4/7/16 6/23/16 Conditional Certification and Rule 23 Class Certification
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer