Filed: Mar. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . In accordance with Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company (collectively, "Chrimar") and Defendant NETGEAR, Inc. ("NETGEAR"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: On July 1, 2015, Chrimar filed suit against various defendants in the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . In accordance with Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company (collectively, "Chrimar") and Defendant NETGEAR, Inc. ("NETGEAR"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: On July 1, 2015, Chrimar filed suit against various defendants in the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U...
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
In accordance with Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company (collectively, "Chrimar") and Defendant NETGEAR, Inc. ("NETGEAR"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
On July 1, 2015, Chrimar filed suit against various defendants in the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,155,012, 8,942,107, 8,902,760, and 9,019,838 (collectively, the "Patents-in-Suit").
Four of the cases have been transferred to the Northern District of California, and are presently before this Court: Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00558-SI (N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-186-SI (N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. NETGEAR, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-624-SI (N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Fortinet, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00897-SI (N.D. Cal.) (collectively, the "N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases").
The Court has set the four N.D. Cal. Chrimar cases for case management conferences ("CMCs") on four separate dates: April 15, 2016 (Case No. -897); April 22, 2016 (Case No. 186); May 6, 2016 (Case No. -558); and May 20, 2016 (Case No. -624).
Counsel for the parties in all of the N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases have conferred and believe that there would be benefits to the Court and the parties to schedule the CMCs for all of the cases scheduled on the same date, and at the Court's convenience, at the same time if possible.
Counsel for the parties in all of the N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases are available for CMC on April 22, 2016, which is the date the Court had set the CMC for the Chrimar v. Ruckus case (No. 3:16-cv-186). Accordingly, if the Court's schedule permits, counsel for the parties in this action have agreed to reschedule the CMC currently set for May 20, 2016, to April 22, 2016, at or near 2:30 p.m., when the Ruckus CMC is currently scheduled.
No prior changes to the schedule have been made since this action was transferred to this Court.
Because the Court has not entered a Scheduling Order in any of the four N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases, the requested time modification will have no effect on the schedule for this or any of the cases.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the CMC in this case shall be rescheduled to April 22, 2016, at 2:30 p.m. and the related deadline for filing a joint CMC statement is adjusted to April 15, 2016.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
