Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc., 16-cv-00119-HSG. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160330f60 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Defendant Dropbox, Inc. ("Dropbox") and Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. ("Synchronoss"), by and through their respective counsel and subject to the Court's approval, have met conferred and hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, in light of the Easter holiday and conflicting deadlines facing counsel for Dropb
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]

Defendant Dropbox, Inc. ("Dropbox") and Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. ("Synchronoss"), by and through their respective counsel and subject to the Court's approval, have met conferred and hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, in light of the Easter holiday and conflicting deadlines facing counsel for Dropbox, there is good cause to extend the date for Dropbox's reply in support of its pending Motion to Dismiss (ECF 81) by one week, from March 31, 2016 to and including April 7, 2016;

WHEREAS, there has only been one prior time modification in this case when the Court granted Synchronoss' motion for an extension of time to respond to Dropbox's original February 5, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF 70, 71);

WHEREAS, the parties' requested extension will have no impact on the schedule for the case or the Motion's April 28, 2016 hearing date; the requested one-week extension will still leave the Court with three (3) weeks to review all of the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the Motion, and prepare for the hearing; and the brief extension will not prevent the Motion from being fully briefed before the April 12 Initial Case Management Conference;

NOW, THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT subject to the Court's approval: The date for Defendant Dropbox to file its reply in support of the currently pending Motion to Dismiss (ECF 81) is extended from March 31, 2016, to and including April 7, 2016.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer