Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Camacho v. K.J. Woods Construction, Inc., 15-cv-05141-KAW. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160331d11 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2016
Summary: NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; REQUEST THAT MATTER BE DISMISSED AND THAT CLERK CLOSE FILE; [PROPOSED] ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE , District Judge . TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES TO THIS ACTION: NOTICE IS HEREBY given that Plaintiff J. LEONIDAS CAMACHO hereby requests that all Defendants K.J. WOODS CONSTRUCTION, INC; KIERAN JOSEPH WOODS dba WOODS CONSTRUCTION be Dismissed with prejudice. This notice is accompanied by the declaration of counsel and proposed order. DECLARATION OF T
More

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; REQUEST THAT MATTER BE DISMISSED AND THAT CLERK CLOSE FILE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES TO THIS ACTION:

NOTICE IS HEREBY given that Plaintiff J. LEONIDAS CAMACHO hereby requests that all Defendants K.J. WOODS CONSTRUCTION, INC; KIERAN JOSEPH WOODS dba WOODS CONSTRUCTION be Dismissed with prejudice. This notice is accompanied by the declaration of counsel and proposed order.

DECLARATION OF TOMAS E. MARGAIN

I, Tomas E. Margain, declare as follows:

1. I am the attorney of record for Plaintiff J. LEONIDAS CAMACHO in this case. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration, and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify thereto.

2. Plaintiff has consented to have a Magistrate hear his case. See Docket 5.

3. After being sued, Defendants hired the firm of Leonidou & Rosin, APC to represent them. I was able to settle my client's dispute over the course of several negotiations conferences with Caitlin Kaufman an attorney admitted to this Court after exchanging documents.

4. The matter was settled prior to Defendants entering an appearance and as such I cannot submit a stipulation and order to Dismiss with prejudice.

5. I have the authority of my client to have this case Dismissed with Prejudice.

I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct, executed on March 25, 2016 in San Jose, California.

ORDER

Based on GOOD CAUSE shown and upon the Notice and Declaration of Plaintiff's counsel Tomas E. Margain, the Court orders as follows:

The matter is Dismissed with Prejudice. All calendared dates are hereby vacated and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer