Filed: Apr. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . WHEREAS, on December 30, 2015, Peter Kravitz, as Trustee for the RSH Liquidating Trust ("Plaintiff") filed the above-captioned action. It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by and through their respective attorneys, that for purposes of this action only: 1. Undersigned counsel of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP agree to accept servic
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . WHEREAS, on December 30, 2015, Peter Kravitz, as Trustee for the RSH Liquidating Trust ("Plaintiff") filed the above-captioned action. It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by and through their respective attorneys, that for purposes of this action only: 1. Undersigned counsel of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP agree to accept service..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on December 30, 2015, Peter Kravitz, as Trustee for the RSH Liquidating Trust ("Plaintiff") filed the above-captioned action.
It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by and through their respective attorneys, that for purposes of this action only:
1. Undersigned counsel of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP agree to accept service of process of the Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 30, 2015 on behalf of Defendants Sony Optiarc America Inc. and Sony Electronics Inc.
2. Undersigned counsel of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP agree on behalf of their clients Defendants Sony Corporation ("Sony Corp.") and Sony Optiarc Inc. ("Sony Optiarc") that Plaintiff may serve the Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 30, 2015 on Sony Corp. and Sony Optiarc in Japan via certified mail or United Parcel Service.
3. Undersigned counsel of O'Melveny & Myers LLP agree to accept service of process of the Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 30, 2015 on behalf of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
4. Undersigned counsel of Latham & Watkins LLP agree to accept service of process of the Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 30, 2015 on behalf of Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp., and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp.
5. Undersigned counsel of Baker Botts LLP agree to accept service of process of the Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 30, 2015 on behalf of Defendants Lite-On IT Corp., Lite-On Sales & Distribution Inc., Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corp., and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc.
6. All Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint no later than May 4, 2016.
7. If any Defendants respond by moving to dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiff's opposition to any such motion(s) shall be due sixty (60) days thereafter, and any reply brief(s) shall be due thirty (30) days thereafter.
8. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Defendants of any defense, including but not limited to those defenses provided under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ATTESTANTION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
