Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARY MARTINOVSKY, M.D. v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, 3:16-cv-00403-MMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160414a50 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Local rule 6-2 (a), and as supported by the Declaration of Talia Saypoff filed herewith, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enlarge time for the Case Management Conference, currently set for April 22, 2016. The parties declare i
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Local rule 6-2 (a), and as supported by the Declaration of Talia Saypoff filed herewith, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enlarge time for the Case Management Conference, currently set for April 22, 2016. The parties declare in support of this request:

WHEREAS, on January 22, 2016 plaintiffs filed their original Complaint for damages;

WHEREAS, on April 7, 2016 pursuant to an agreed-upon extension of time, defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, NANCY E. O'MALLEY, JOHN PAUL WILLIAMS and EDDIE BERMUDEZ filed their Notice of Motion, Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement;

WHEREAS, on April 8, 2016, defendant FERNANDO CUBANGBANG filed his Notice of Motions, Motion to Dismiss, Motion for More Definite Statement and Request for Stay;

WHEREAS, the hearing on all defendants' Motions to Dismiss, Motions for More Definite Statement and Request for Stay are set for May 20, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is set for April 22, 2016 and the Case Management Statement and Initial Disclosures are due on April 14, 2016; and

WHEREAS, the parties are in agreement that in the interest of judicial efficiency, the Case Management Conference should be continued to a date on or after the hearing on defendants' Motions to Dismiss, Motions for More Definite Statement and Request for Stay.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to court approval, by and between the undersigned counsel on behalf of the parties as follows:

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 6-2, the April 22, 2016 Case Management Conference is continued to a date on or after May 20, 2016;

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature ("/s/") within this E-filed document or have been authorized by counsel to show their signatures on this Stipulation as/s/.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, and the parties' having stipulated to the same, the parties' stipulation is hereby APPROVED. The Case Management Conference currently set for April 22, 2016 is continued to July 1, 2016, at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer