Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

The Burlington Insurance Company v. Fitness Anywhere, LLC, 15-cv-00983-VC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160415948
Filed: Apr. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos. 76, 78 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . Burlington and Berkley are ordered to file a response to TRX's objections by Friday, April 15, 2016. In particular, Burlington and Berkeley should address whether the second paragraph of the proposed judgment is necessary. At first glance, it appears to the Court that the second paragraph is not necessary, and its removal would moot any objection that TRX could possibly have to entry of judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 76, 78

Burlington and Berkley are ordered to file a response to TRX's objections by Friday, April 15, 2016. In particular, Burlington and Berkeley should address whether the second paragraph of the proposed judgment is necessary. At first glance, it appears to the Court that the second paragraph is not necessary, and its removal would moot any objection that TRX could possibly have to entry of judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer