Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 3:13-cv-3826-EMC (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160425639 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The undersigned Parties, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate: WHEREAS, the parties agree that an additional seven pages is necessary and will be sufficient for Plaintiffs to address all issues that must be raised in a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, including the requirements of Rule
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF

The undersigned Parties, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate:

WHEREAS, the parties agree that an additional seven pages is necessary and will be sufficient for Plaintiffs to address all issues that must be raised in a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, including the requirements of Rule 23 and the reasons that the Court should preliminarily approve the parties' class action settlement;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel, that Plaintiffs may file a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement of up to 32 pages in length.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer