ChriMar Systems Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc., 13-cv-01300-JSW. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160502934
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADMONISHING PARTIES JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . On April 6, 2016, the Court issued an Order in which it relieved the parties of their obligations to provide chambers copies of redacted materials. In that Order, the Court stated that "[g]oing forward, the parties shall submit a chambeers copy of the un-redacted version of any document sought to be filed under seal. If only a portion of the document is to be sealed, the party submitting the document shall highlight the portion t
Summary: ORDER ADMONISHING PARTIES JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . On April 6, 2016, the Court issued an Order in which it relieved the parties of their obligations to provide chambers copies of redacted materials. In that Order, the Court stated that "[g]oing forward, the parties shall submit a chambeers copy of the un-redacted version of any document sought to be filed under seal. If only a portion of the document is to be sealed, the party submitting the document shall highlight the portion to..
More
ORDER ADMONISHING PARTIES
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
On April 6, 2016, the Court issued an Order in which it relieved the parties of their obligations to provide chambers copies of redacted materials. In that Order, the Court stated that "[g]oing forward, the parties shall submit a chambeers copy of the un-redacted version of any document sought to be filed under seal. If only a portion of the document is to be sealed, the party submitting the document shall highlight the portion to be sealeed for the Court." (Docket No. Docket No. 357.) The Court continues to receive chambers copies of redacted versions of materials that the parties seek to file under seal. The Court issues this Order to admonish the parties to discontinue that practice in this case. The Court only wishes to receive a single chambers copy of documents that are filed. Thus, if the parties have asked that documents be filed under seal, the single chambers copy to be submittted to Court should be the un-redacted version, as set forth in the preceding paragraph.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
