ChriMar Systems Inc v. Cisco Systems Inc, 13-cv-01300-JSW (MEJ). (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160503b91
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 02, 2016
Latest Update: May 02, 2016
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos. 287, 367 MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . On April 21, 2016, the Court ordered ChriMar to either (a) produce certain emails for which it had failed to meet its burden to establish privilege, or (b) lodge (not file) a brief for in camera review addressing the deficiencies noted in that Order. Dkt. No. 367. In response, ChriMar produced certain email to Cisco and submitted its additional brief as to the remaining emails on April 28, 2016. Having reviewed
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos. 287, 367 MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . On April 21, 2016, the Court ordered ChriMar to either (a) produce certain emails for which it had failed to meet its burden to establish privilege, or (b) lodge (not file) a brief for in camera review addressing the deficiencies noted in that Order. Dkt. No. 367. In response, ChriMar produced certain email to Cisco and submitted its additional brief as to the remaining emails on April 28, 2016. Having reviewed C..
More
DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos. 287, 367
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
On April 21, 2016, the Court ordered ChriMar to either (a) produce certain emails for which it had failed to meet its burden to establish privilege, or (b) lodge (not file) a brief for in camera review addressing the deficiencies noted in that Order. Dkt. No. 367. In response, ChriMar produced certain email to Cisco and submitted its additional brief as to the remaining emails on April 28, 2016. Having reviewed ChriMar's brief, the Court finds it has now met its burden to establish privilege and therefore need not produce any of the remaining emails.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
