Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc., C 10-03561 WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160505871
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE ORACLE'S PR CIS REQUEST (Dkt. No. 1808) WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Oracle may file its motion directed at Roderic Cattell by MONDAY, MAY 9 AT NOON, with Google's response due by FRIDAY, MAY 13 AT NOON, and any reply due by MONDAY, MAY 16 AT NOON. The briefs in support and opposition are NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES, and each side's backup material shall be limited to FIFTY PAGES. In the meantime, while Google's counsel will be free to refer to the subject of Cattell's te
Summary: ORDER RE ORACLE'S PR CIS REQUEST (Dkt. No. 1808) WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Oracle may file its motion directed at Roderic Cattell by MONDAY, MAY 9 AT NOON, with Google's response due by FRIDAY, MAY 13 AT NOON, and any reply due by MONDAY, MAY 16 AT NOON. The briefs in support and opposition are NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES, and each side's backup material shall be limited to FIFTY PAGES. In the meantime, while Google's counsel will be free to refer to the subject of Cattell's tes..
More
ORDER RE ORACLE'S PRÉCIS REQUEST (Dkt. No. 1808)
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Oracle may file its motion directed at Roderic Cattell by MONDAY, MAY 9 AT NOON, with Google's response due by FRIDAY, MAY 13 AT NOON, and any reply due by MONDAY, MAY 16 AT NOON. The briefs in support and opposition are NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES, and each side's backup material shall be limited to FIFTY PAGES. In the meantime, while Google's counsel will be free to refer to the subject of Cattell's testimony during opening statements, they run the risk that his testimony will be excluded in whole or in part.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
