Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HUYNH v. VONG, 16-cv-01145-HRL. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160505935 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 9 HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . The court having been informed that this case has settled, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated. On or before June 3, 2016, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court, 280 So
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 9

The court having been informed that this case has settled, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated.

On or before June 3, 2016, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California on June 7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in response to this Order to Show Cause no later than June 3, 2016 advising as to (1) the status of the activities of the parties in finalizing settlement; and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a statement in response to this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer