Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sturgis v. Brady, 4:08-cv-05363-SBA (PR). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160506a49 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL Dkt. 119 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG , Senior District Judge . Because Plaintiff has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him in this matter and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of the Federal Pro Bono Project, counsel is hereby appointed as counsel for Lamos Sturgis in this matter: William S. Freeman (Bar No. 82002) wfreeman@jonesday.com Valerie McConnell (Bar No. 274159) vmcconnell@jonesday.com
More

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL

Dkt. 119

Because Plaintiff has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him in this matter and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of the Federal Pro Bono Project, counsel is hereby appointed as counsel for Lamos Sturgis in this matter:

William S. Freeman (Bar No. 82002) wfreeman@jonesday.com Valerie McConnell (Bar No. 274159) vmcconnell@jonesday.com JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 (650) 739-3939

The scope of this referral shall be for the limited purpose of representing the litigant at deposition and at a settlement conference.

Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project Guidelines posted on the Court's website.

Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied as moot. The Clerk shall terminate Docket 119.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer