IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 1917 (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160509548
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING LGE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: ECF No. 4556. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . LG Electronics, Inc. ("LGE") moves to file under seal portions of its Request for Leave to File Additional Motions. ECF No. 4556. LGE seeks to file under seal because Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation (the "Designating Parties") have designated the material as highly confidential. Local Rule 79-5 requires that, within four days of the filing of the administ
Summary: ORDER REGARDING LGE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: ECF No. 4556. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . LG Electronics, Inc. ("LGE") moves to file under seal portions of its Request for Leave to File Additional Motions. ECF No. 4556. LGE seeks to file under seal because Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation (the "Designating Parties") have designated the material as highly confidential. Local Rule 79-5 requires that, within four days of the filing of the administr..
More
ORDER REGARDING LGE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: ECF No. 4556.
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
LG Electronics, Inc. ("LGE") moves to file under seal portions of its Request for Leave to File Additional Motions. ECF No. 4556. LGE seeks to file under seal because Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation (the "Designating Parties") have designated the material as highly confidential. Local Rule 79-5 requires that, within four days of the filing of the administrative motion to file under seal, the Designating Parties file a declaration establishing that the designated material is sealable. The Designating Parties failed to file a declaration in support of sealing within four days of the filing of LGE's motion on April 12, 2016. Should the Designating Parties not file their declaration by May 11, 2016, the Court will deny the motion to file under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
