STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY AND ORDER

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.

This stipulation in the above-captioned matter is made by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff Stephanie Pamintuan ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ("Defendant").

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, that the prescribed time within which Defendant may reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is extended to May 23, 2016. Given the new jurisdictional allegations in Plaintiff's opposition, an extension of time is warranted.

This is the parties' second stipulated request for an extension of time. On February 16, 2016, the Court granted the parties' first stipulated request for reciprocal 30-day extensions of the prescribed time within which Defendants were permitted to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint and the time within which Plaintiff was permitted to respond to any motion filed by Defendants in response to the Complaint. Order, ECF 17.

The parties agree to the current stipulated request for an extension, and the extension does not affect any other previously scheduled dates.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Krista M. Enns, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories who are listed on this signature page.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.