Arrizon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 16-cv-00959 NC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160509791
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2016
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND REQUESTING REASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DUE TO LACK OF CONSENT NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . On April 4, 2016, the Court warned plaintiff Guadalupe Arrizon that if she did not respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss her complaint by April 13, then the Court would recommend the dismissal of her case. The Court has not received an opposition from Arrizon. Arrizon also has not responded to the Cour
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND REQUESTING REASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DUE TO LACK OF CONSENT NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . On April 4, 2016, the Court warned plaintiff Guadalupe Arrizon that if she did not respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss her complaint by April 13, then the Court would recommend the dismissal of her case. The Court has not received an opposition from Arrizon. Arrizon also has not responded to the Court..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND REQUESTING REASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DUE TO LACK OF CONSENT
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
On April 4, 2016, the Court warned plaintiff Guadalupe Arrizon that if she did not respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss her complaint by April 13, then the Court would recommend the dismissal of her case. The Court has not received an opposition from Arrizon. Arrizon also has not responded to the Court's requests that she either consent to or decline the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.
Accordingly, the Court recommends the dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. Because not all parties have consented to jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the dismissal is a report and recommendation to a District Court Judge. Any party may object to the recommendation, but must do so within 14 days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Clerk of Court is asked to randomly reassign this case to a District Court Judge in San Jose.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
