Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Freeman v. King, 3:15-cv-05539-CRB. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160510972 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 09, 2016
Latest Update: May 09, 2016
Summary: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The parties in the above referenced matter have settled their dispute. We therefore request a dismissal with prejudice as to the entire action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), by stipulation of the parties. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Michael A. Freeman, individually, and as Trustee of the Michael A. Freeman M.D. Retirement Plan U/A DTD 01/01/2004 and Defen
More

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

The parties in the above referenced matter have settled their dispute. We therefore request a dismissal with prejudice as to the entire action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), by stipulation of the parties.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Michael A. Freeman, individually, and as Trustee of the Michael A. Freeman M.D. Retirement Plan U/A DTD 01/01/2004 and Defendant Virginia H. King, individually, and as principal of V. H. King Associates, a sole proprietorship, the only parties to the above-captioned action, by and through their counsel of record, that the above-captioned action may be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees, and that the Court may enter the Order of Dismissal below.

SO STIPULATED

ORDER OF DISMISSAL:

Pursuant to the above stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case be and is dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer