Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michalski v. Colvin, 3:15-cv-4483-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160510982 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 09, 2016
Latest Update: May 09, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of 30 days in which to file his motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion, which was formerly due on May 10, 2016 is now due on June 9, 2016. This extension is necessary to provide further opportunity for re
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of 30 days in which to file his motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion, which was formerly due on May 10, 2016 is now due on June 9, 2016. This extension is necessary to provide further opportunity for review and analysis of this case. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Procedural Order shall be modified accordingly.

This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension.

BRIAN J. STRETCH Acting United States Attorney Date:5/6/16 By: "/s/April Alongi" (as authorized via email on 5/6/16) APRIL ALONGI Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

PERSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have an additional 30 days in which to file his motion for summary judgment, up to and including JUNE 9, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer