Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc., 3:13-CV-05808-HSG. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160511918
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 10, 2016
Latest Update: May 10, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR 12 HOUR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") have filed a Motion for 12 Hour Extension of Deadline to File Replies in Support of Daubert Motions. Having considered the Motion, and good cause having been shown, the Court GRANTS Defend
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR 12 HOUR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") have filed a Motion for 12 Hour Extension of Deadline to File Replies in Support of Daubert Motions. Having considered the Motion, and good cause having been shown, the Court GRANTS Defenda..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR 12 HOUR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") have filed a Motion for 12 Hour Extension of Deadline to File Replies in Support of Daubert Motions.
Having considered the Motion, and good cause having been shown, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion and ORDERS that the deadline for filing replies in support of Daubert motions is extended from May 10, 2016 to May 11, 2016 at noon.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
