SABERI v. LES STANFORD CHEVROLET CADILLAC, INC., 16-CV-2203-YGR. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160513d13
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 12, 2016
Latest Update: May 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . On May 6, 2016, plaintiff filed a Motion for Order Shortening Time to Hear Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand so that the Court need not hear defendants' motion to dismiss until after it has reached a decision on the motion for remand. (Dkt. No. 16.) Defendants opposed plaintiff's motion, recommending instead that the motion to dismiss be continued to a date after the hearing on the motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 18.) The Co
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . On May 6, 2016, plaintiff filed a Motion for Order Shortening Time to Hear Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand so that the Court need not hear defendants' motion to dismiss until after it has reached a decision on the motion for remand. (Dkt. No. 16.) Defendants opposed plaintiff's motion, recommending instead that the motion to dismiss be continued to a date after the hearing on the motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 18.) The Cou..
More
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
On May 6, 2016, plaintiff filed a Motion for Order Shortening Time to Hear Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand so that the Court need not hear defendants' motion to dismiss until after it has reached a decision on the motion for remand. (Dkt. No. 16.) Defendants opposed plaintiff's motion, recommending instead that the motion to dismiss be continued to a date after the hearing on the motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 18.)
The Court DENIES plaintiff's Motion for Order Shortening Time to Hear Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand and CONTINUES the hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss from Tuesday, June 14, 2016 to Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in the Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building, located at 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. Notwithstanding the above, the briefing schedules set for both hearings shall remain unchanged. If the Court deems necessary, it will continue the motion to dismiss hearing to a later date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
