Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") in the California Superior Court, San Mateo County; WHEREAS, May 9, 2016, Chase removed this action to this Court; WHEREAS pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81, Chase's deadline to respond to the complaint would
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") in the California Superior Court, San Mateo County; WHEREAS, May 9, 2016, Chase removed this action to this Court; WHEREAS pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81, Chase's deadline to respond to the complaint would ..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)
JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") in the California Superior Court, San Mateo County;
WHEREAS, May 9, 2016, Chase removed this action to this Court;
WHEREAS pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81, Chase's deadline to respond to the complaint would be May 16, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Chase requires additional time to investigate the allegations in the Complaint and to commence a dialogue with Plaintiffs regarding potential settlement;
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Chase HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The deadline for Chase to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint shall be extended up to and including June 16, 2016.
2. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1, I hereby attest that Eunji Cho, counsel for Plaintiffs Wayne and Gladys Chan, has provided her concurrence in the electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a).
