Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc., 3:14-CV-01661-HSG. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160517839
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF WITHOUT PREJUDICE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's April 14, 2016 Minute Order, Plaintiff HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ("Hartford") and Defendants TEMPUR-SEALY INTERNATIONAL, INC. and TEMPUR-PEDIC NORTH AMERICA, LLC (collectively, "Tempur-Sealy") stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Hartford's Second Claim for Relief in its Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this action may be dismissed with
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF WITHOUT PREJUDICE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's April 14, 2016 Minute Order, Plaintiff HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ("Hartford") and Defendants TEMPUR-SEALY INTERNATIONAL, INC. and TEMPUR-PEDIC NORTH AMERICA, LLC (collectively, "Tempur-Sealy") stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Hartford's Second Claim for Relief in its Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this action may be dismissed witho..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF WITHOUT PREJUDICE
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court's April 14, 2016 Minute Order, Plaintiff HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ("Hartford") and Defendants TEMPUR-SEALY INTERNATIONAL, INC. and TEMPUR-PEDIC NORTH AMERICA, LLC (collectively, "Tempur-Sealy") stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Hartford's Second Claim for Relief in its Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this action may be dismissed without prejudice; and
2. Any future action regarding Hartford's obligation to indemnify Tempur-Sealy in connection with the lawsuit captioned Todd v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-04984-JST (N.D. Cal.), shall be filed in the Northern District of California, unless the parties agree to another forum.
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory to this document.
ORDER
THE COURT, having considered the attached stipulation of the parties, orders:
1. That Hartford's Second Claim for Relief in its Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; and
2. That any future action regarding Hartford's obligation to indemnify Tempur-Sealy in connection with the lawsuit captioned Todd v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-04984-JST (N.D. Cal.), shall be filed in the Northern District of California, unless the parties agree to another forum.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle