SLUSHER v. CITY OF NAPA, C 15-2394 SBA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160517881
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER HOLDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN ABEYANCE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG , District Judge . In the interests of judicial economy and conserving the parties' resources, Defendants' respective motions to dismiss (Dkt. 85, 87) shall be held in ABEYANCE pending the Court's ruling on the County Defendants' motion to stay (Dkt. 84). The briefing schedule and hearing date on the motions to dismiss will be reset, if appropriate, at a later date. The briefing schedule on the motion to stay shall remain
Summary: ORDER HOLDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN ABEYANCE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG , District Judge . In the interests of judicial economy and conserving the parties' resources, Defendants' respective motions to dismiss (Dkt. 85, 87) shall be held in ABEYANCE pending the Court's ruling on the County Defendants' motion to stay (Dkt. 84). The briefing schedule and hearing date on the motions to dismiss will be reset, if appropriate, at a later date. The briefing schedule on the motion to stay shall remain u..
More
ORDER HOLDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN ABEYANCE
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
In the interests of judicial economy and conserving the parties' resources, Defendants' respective motions to dismiss (Dkt. 85, 87) shall be held in ABEYANCE pending the Court's ruling on the County Defendants' motion to stay (Dkt. 84). The briefing schedule and hearing date on the motions to dismiss will be reset, if appropriate, at a later date. The briefing schedule on the motion to stay shall remain unchanged. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Local Rule 7-1(b), the motion to stay may be resolved without oral argument.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
