Smith v. Safeway Inc., 11-01230 RS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160518940
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER OF DISMISSAL [FED. R. CIV. P. 41 (A)(1)(A)(ii)] RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Defendant Safeway Inc., and Plaintiffs Eleanor Tate (Shonkoff) and Martha Smith, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, stipulate that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiffs dismiss with prejudice each of their individual claims. Any class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Except as
Summary: ORDER STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER OF DISMISSAL [FED. R. CIV. P. 41 (A)(1)(A)(ii)] RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Defendant Safeway Inc., and Plaintiffs Eleanor Tate (Shonkoff) and Martha Smith, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, stipulate that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiffs dismiss with prejudice each of their individual claims. Any class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Except as o..
More
ORDER
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER OF DISMISSAL
[FED. R. CIV. P. 41 (A)(1)(A)(ii)]
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Defendant Safeway Inc., and Plaintiffs Eleanor Tate (Shonkoff) and Martha Smith, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, stipulate that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiffs dismiss with prejudice each of their individual claims. Any class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Except as otherwise provided for by the Parties, all costs and fees arising out of this action are waived by the Parties.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle