Trulove v. City & County San Francisco, 16-CV-0050 YGR. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160518988
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME DKT. NO. 54 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on May 6, 2016. (Dkt. No. 50.) The parties to this action having stipulated through their respective counsel (Dkt. No. 54), the Court ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff to file response to Rule 12 Motion no later than June 3, 2016; and Defendants to file reply to Rule 12 Motion no later than June 17, 2016. This termin
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME DKT. NO. 54 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on May 6, 2016. (Dkt. No. 50.) The parties to this action having stipulated through their respective counsel (Dkt. No. 54), the Court ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff to file response to Rule 12 Motion no later than June 3, 2016; and Defendants to file reply to Rule 12 Motion no later than June 17, 2016. This termina..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
DKT. NO. 54
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on May 6, 2016. (Dkt. No. 50.) The parties to this action having stipulated through their respective counsel (Dkt. No. 54), the Court ORDERS as follows:
Plaintiff to file response to Rule 12 Motion no later than June 3, 2016; and
Defendants to file reply to Rule 12 Motion no later than June 17, 2016.
This terminates Docket No. 54.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
