Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . On April 28, 2016, the Court held a hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 81. Defendant brought its motion on the basis that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,671,757; 7,587,446; and 6,757,696 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101. On May 12, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2015-1244, 2016 WL 2756255 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2016). The parties are directed to submit simultane
Summary: ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . On April 28, 2016, the Court held a hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 81. Defendant brought its motion on the basis that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,671,757; 7,587,446; and 6,757,696 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101. On May 12, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2015-1244, 2016 WL 2756255 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2016). The parties are directed to submit simultaneo..
More
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
On April 28, 2016, the Court held a hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 81. Defendant brought its motion on the basis that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,671,757; 7,587,446; and 6,757,696 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. On May 12, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2015-1244, 2016 WL 2756255 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2016).
The parties are directed to submit simultaneous supplemental briefing on the import of Enfish on the pending motion to dismiss. The parties shall file briefs of no more than 5 pages on or before May 27, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
