VAN PHAM v. CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED, 16-cv-00487-EMC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160523755
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Docket No. 24 EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Previously, the Court issued an order instructing Plaintiff to show cause as to why his complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to oppose and/or failure to prosecute. The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the order to show cause within the time specified would result in a dismissal of the case with prejudice. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order to sho
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Docket No. 24 EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Previously, the Court issued an order instructing Plaintiff to show cause as to why his complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to oppose and/or failure to prosecute. The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the order to show cause within the time specified would result in a dismissal of the case with prejudice. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order to show..
More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Docket No. 24
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Previously, the Court issued an order instructing Plaintiff to show cause as to why his complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to oppose and/or failure to prosecute. The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the order to show cause within the time specified would result in a dismissal of the case with prejudice. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order to show cause. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES this case with prejudice and instructs the Clerk of the Court to close the file in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
