KAUFMAN v. SPEARMAN, 15-cv-02777-JD. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160524843
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 23, 2016
Latest Update: May 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; STAYING CASE AND REFERRAL TO MEDIATION JAMES DONATO , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The parties have filed a joint stipulation stating that a settlement conference would be beneficial. Therefore, this case shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Vadas for a settlement conference pursuant to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program. The conference will take place within
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; STAYING CASE AND REFERRAL TO MEDIATION JAMES DONATO , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The parties have filed a joint stipulation stating that a settlement conference would be beneficial. Therefore, this case shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Vadas for a settlement conference pursuant to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program. The conference will take place within ..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; STAYING CASE AND REFERRAL TO MEDIATION
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have filed a joint stipulation stating that a settlement conference would be beneficial. Therefore, this case shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Vadas for a settlement conference pursuant to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program. The conference will take place within one hundred and twenty days of the date this order is filed. Magistrate Judge Vadas will coordinate a time and date for a settlement proceedings with all interested parties and/or their representatives and, within five days after conclusion of the settlement proceedings, file with the Court a report of the proceedings.
CONLCUSION
1. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Docket No. 16) is DENIED because defendants timely responded to the complaint.
2. The joint motion for a settlement conference (Docket No. 20) is GRANTED.
3. The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Vadas for settlement proceedings pursuant to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program. The Clerk with send a copy of this order to Magistrate Judge Vadas in Eureka, California.
4. In view of the referral, this case is STAYED pending the settlement proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
