BARRAZA v. VICTORIA FIRE & CASUALTY CO., 4:16-cv-00309-JSW. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160524864
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 23, 2016
Latest Update: May 23, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . Richard W. Meier seeks to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff in the above caption litigation pursuant to Local R. 11-5(a) and Cal. R. Prof. Conduct 3-700(A)(1). As this Court finds that Mr. Meier has submitted satisfactory reasoning for withdrawal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Richard W. Meier's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff is GRANTED, and Richard W. Meier is terminated a
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . Richard W. Meier seeks to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff in the above caption litigation pursuant to Local R. 11-5(a) and Cal. R. Prof. Conduct 3-700(A)(1). As this Court finds that Mr. Meier has submitted satisfactory reasoning for withdrawal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Richard W. Meier's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff is GRANTED, and Richard W. Meier is terminated as..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
Richard W. Meier seeks to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff in the above caption litigation pursuant to Local R. 11-5(a) and Cal. R. Prof. Conduct 3-700(A)(1). As this Court finds that Mr. Meier has submitted satisfactory reasoning for withdrawal.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Richard W. Meier's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff is GRANTED, and Richard W. Meier is terminated as counsel for Plaintiff in this proceeding.
As there has been no substitution of counsel, Plaintiff shall appear pro se in this matter. All court filings shall be delivered to Plaintiff directly at 1817 Fruitvale Avenue, Oakland, CA 94601.
Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause regarding whether he intends to proceed with this matter in writing to this Court by June 10, 2016. Should Plaintiff fail to file a written response to this Order by June 10, the Court shall dismiss this action.
Source: Leagle
