Bohannon v. Facebook, Inc., 12-cv-01894-BLF. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160524868
Visitors: 26
Filed: May 23, 2016
Latest Update: May 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE REVISED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [Re: ECF 157] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . At the hearing on the parties' motion for settlement approval, the Court expressed several concerns with the submitted draft. See Hearing Transcr. at 3-17, ECF 158. Following the hearing, the parties submitted a revised version for approval. ECF 157. The Revised Agreement addresses all but one of the Court's concerns—whether or not a minor's compromise is necessary prior to resolution
Summary: ORDER RE REVISED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [Re: ECF 157] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . At the hearing on the parties' motion for settlement approval, the Court expressed several concerns with the submitted draft. See Hearing Transcr. at 3-17, ECF 158. Following the hearing, the parties submitted a revised version for approval. ECF 157. The Revised Agreement addresses all but one of the Court's concerns—whether or not a minor's compromise is necessary prior to resolution o..
More
ORDER RE REVISED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
[Re: ECF 157]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
At the hearing on the parties' motion for settlement approval, the Court expressed several concerns with the submitted draft. See Hearing Transcr. at 3-17, ECF 158. Following the hearing, the parties submitted a revised version for approval. ECF 157. The Revised Agreement addresses all but one of the Court's concerns—whether or not a minor's compromise is necessary prior to resolution of this case.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to advise the Court of whether or not a minor's compromise is required for the release of the named minor Plaintiffs' rights. Plaintiffs shall submit a response of no more than 3 pages explaining why such a compromise is or is not required by no later than May 26, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
