WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the parties to the above entitled action, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") in this Court on April 11, 2016;
WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintffs' Third Amended Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") on May 9, 2016;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due on May 23, 2016;
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Plaintiffs may have an extension of 7 days to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, which would make Plaintiffs' response due on Tuesday, May 31, 2016;
WHEREAS, currently, Defendant's reply to Plaintiffs' response is due on May 31, 2016;
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Defendant's new deadline to reply to Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss would be June 10, 2016;
WHEREAS, currently, the hearing date on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for June 15, 2016;
WHEREAS, if, given the new briefing schedule, the original hearing date is not convenient for the Court, the Court will move the hearing date to June 22, 2016; and
WHEREAS, this stipulation will not alter any other date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their undersigned attorneys, that Plaintiff shall have a 7-day extension to respond to Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, making Plaintiffs' response due on or before May 31, 2016.
Plaintiffs' new response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due on Tuesday, May 31, 2016;
Defendant's new deadline to reply to Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due on June 10, 2016;
The hearing date on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for June 15, 2016; given the new briefing schedule, the original hearing date is not convenient for the Court, the Court moves the hearing date to June 22, 2016.