DAVIS v. CAPGEMINI U.S. LLC, 14-cv-05627-JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160527952
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 26, 2016
Latest Update: May 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Re: ECF Nos. 17, 20 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . In the parties' responses to the Court's Order to Show Cause, both parties state they have settled the action and request the Court dismiss the case with prejudice. See ECF No. 17 (Defendant's response); ECF No. 20 (Plaintiff's response). Since both parties agree that dismissal with prejudice is appropriate, the Court now dismisses the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). This
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Re: ECF Nos. 17, 20 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . In the parties' responses to the Court's Order to Show Cause, both parties state they have settled the action and request the Court dismiss the case with prejudice. See ECF No. 17 (Defendant's response); ECF No. 20 (Plaintiff's response). Since both parties agree that dismissal with prejudice is appropriate, the Court now dismisses the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). This c..
More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Re: ECF Nos. 17, 20
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
In the parties' responses to the Court's Order to Show Cause, both parties state they have settled the action and request the Court dismiss the case with prejudice. See ECF No. 17 (Defendant's response); ECF No. 20 (Plaintiff's response). Since both parties agree that dismissal with prejudice is appropriate, the Court now dismisses the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).
This case has been dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
