STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM OTHERWISE APPLICABLE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through undersigned counsel, that:

1. The parties appeared before the Court on May 3, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. for a status hearing. Mr. Knoblock was present and represented by Federal Public Defender Stephen Kalar. Mr. Melovich was present and represented by Peter Goodman. Assistant United States Attorney Sarah Hawkins appeared for the Government. The parties requested a continuance of the matter, with time excluded for effective preparation of counsel.

2. Accordingly, with the parties' agreement as to the new date, the Court scheduled another status hearing for July 26, 2016 at 2:30 p.m., with the understanding that the parties would submit a Stipulation and Proposed Order excluding time.

3. The parties now formalize their request for a continuance of this matter to July 26, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. for a status conference, and respectfully submit and agree that the period from May 3, 2016 through and including July 26, 2016 should be excluded from the otherwise applicable Speedy Trial Act computation because the continuance is necessary for effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

4. The parties concur that granting the exclusion would allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel and continuity of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such an exclusion of time for the purposes of effective preparation of counsel outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the above-described Stipulation, THE COURT FINDS THAT the ends of justice served by granting a continuance from May 3, 2016 through and including July 26, 2016 outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that failure to grant such a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

Accordingly, THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The parties shall appear before the Court on July 26, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. for further status conference.

2. The period from May 3, 2016 through and including July 26, 2016 is excluded from the otherwise applicable Speedy Trial Act computation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.