MENIOOH v. STATE, C16-00715 CRB. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160527963
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 26, 2016
Latest Update: May 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Plaintiff Rata Bey Meniooh brought suit against a variety of defendants alleging the violations of his civil rights, particularly his right to freedom of movement. See generally Compl. (dkt. 1). Several of those defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff's case. See Mots. (dkt. 17, 18, 24). Plaintiffs' opposition papers were due no more than 14 days after the Motions were filed. See Civil Local Rule 7-3(a). Those opposition pape
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Plaintiff Rata Bey Meniooh brought suit against a variety of defendants alleging the violations of his civil rights, particularly his right to freedom of movement. See generally Compl. (dkt. 1). Several of those defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff's case. See Mots. (dkt. 17, 18, 24). Plaintiffs' opposition papers were due no more than 14 days after the Motions were filed. See Civil Local Rule 7-3(a). Those opposition paper..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rata Bey Meniooh brought suit against a variety of defendants alleging the violations of his civil rights, particularly his right to freedom of movement. See generally Compl. (dkt. 1). Several of those defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff's case. See Mots. (dkt. 17, 18, 24). Plaintiffs' opposition papers were due no more than 14 days after the Motions were filed. See Civil Local Rule 7-3(a). Those opposition papers are now untimely. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by Thursday, June 2, 2016, why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle