Johnson v. City of Berkeley, 15-cv-05343-JSC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160601809
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: May 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Following the Case Management Conference held on May 26, 2016 and for the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Defendants' responses to the outstanding discovery requests are due June 17, 2016. To the extent that the parties have a discovery dispute, they shall use the joint discovery letter procedure set forth in the Court's Standing Order. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (Dkt. No. 59)
Summary: ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Following the Case Management Conference held on May 26, 2016 and for the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Defendants' responses to the outstanding discovery requests are due June 17, 2016. To the extent that the parties have a discovery dispute, they shall use the joint discovery letter procedure set forth in the Court's Standing Order. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (Dkt. No. 59) ..
More
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
Following the Case Management Conference held on May 26, 2016 and for the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
Defendants' responses to the outstanding discovery requests are due June 17, 2016. To the extent that the parties have a discovery dispute, they shall use the joint discovery letter procedure set forth in the Court's Standing Order.
Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (Dkt. No. 59) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file the Third Amended Complaint by June 1, 2016. Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint is due July 7, 2016.
The Court will schedule a Case Management Conference to address the case schedule upon the filing of Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
