Cotter v. Lyft, Inc., 13-cv-04065-VC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160602a77
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . At the hearing on the motion for preliminary approval of the revised class action settlement, the parties should be prepared to discuss the following, assuming it is possible to gather this information in such a short timeframe: • What is the maximum possible restitution value under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 for Lyft's alleged violations of Cal. Labor Code 351 in the period from August 2014 to August 2015, as described by the
Summary: ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . At the hearing on the motion for preliminary approval of the revised class action settlement, the parties should be prepared to discuss the following, assuming it is possible to gather this information in such a short timeframe: • What is the maximum possible restitution value under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 for Lyft's alleged violations of Cal. Labor Code 351 in the period from August 2014 to August 2015, as described by the C..
More
ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
At the hearing on the motion for preliminary approval of the revised class action settlement, the parties should be prepared to discuss the following, assuming it is possible to gather this information in such a short timeframe:
• What is the maximum possible restitution value under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 for Lyft's alleged violations of Cal. Labor Code § 351 in the period from August 2014 to August 2015, as described by the Complaint in Zamora v. Lyft, Inc., No. 16-cv-02558-VC?
• What is the maximum possible restitution value under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 for Lyft's alleged violations of Cal. Labor Code § 351 in the period from August 2015 to the present, as described by the Complaint in Zamora v. Lyft, Inc., No. 16-cv-02558-VC?
• Would it be feasible and appropriate to allocate a portion of the existing proposed settlement amount to these claims?
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
