Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Centex Homes, 3:12-cv-00371-CRB (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160606634 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 31, 2016
Latest Update: May 31, 2016
Summary: JOINT STATUS UPDATE AND ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . On April 25, 2016, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America ("Travelers"), Centex Homes ("Centex") and Newmeyer & Dillion ("Newmeyer") stipulated to stay this case. (Docket No. 184.) RGL, Inc. ("RGL") did not request the stay, but did not object to the stay requested by Travelers, Centex and Newmeyer (the "Parties"). The Parties entered the stipulation to stay in order to facilitate settlement negotiations for the doze
More

JOINT STATUS UPDATE AND ORDER

On April 25, 2016, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America ("Travelers"), Centex Homes ("Centex") and Newmeyer & Dillion ("Newmeyer") stipulated to stay this case. (Docket No. 184.) RGL, Inc. ("RGL") did not request the stay, but did not object to the stay requested by Travelers, Centex and Newmeyer (the "Parties"). The Parties entered the stipulation to stay in order to facilitate settlement negotiations for the dozens of cases pending between them in California state and federal courts.

The Court signed the stipulation, and entered the stay, on April 28, 2016. (Docket No. 185.) The Court's order requested that the Parties submit a joint status update no later than May 24, 2016, following the conclusion of an MSC that was to be held before the Honorable John A. Kronstadt of the Central District of California to discuss a global resolution of the cases pending between the Parties.

During the course of the May 10, 2016, MSC, the Parties reached a tentative settlement as to most of the cases pending between them; however, the Parties did not discuss this particular case. Instead, the Parties agreed to hold a mediation on May 31, 2016, before a neutral in Nevada in order to continue settlement discussions about the cases that remain pending between them. The Parties request the Court leave the stay in place and they further propose that the Court enter an order requiring the Parties to submit another joint status report no later than June 15, 2016, indicating whether a continued stay is warranted or whether the stay should be lifted.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that this case will remain stayed for all purposes.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties submit a joint status update no later than June 16, 2016, following the conclusion of the mediation that will be held on May 31, 2016, before a neutral in Nevada.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer