Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ALI v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, 13-cv-01184-VC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160608782 Visitors: 32
Filed: Jun. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE Re: Dkt. No. 61 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's mandate, Dkt. No. 58, Rizwan Ali is ordered to submit his claims against JP Morgan Chase to final and binding arbitration under the terms of the parties' arbitration agreement. And though 9 U.S.C. 3 "seems to direct that the action `shall' be stayed pending completion of arbitration," the Ninth Circuit has "held that, notwithstanding the lan
More

ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 61

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's mandate, Dkt. No. 58, Rizwan Ali is ordered to submit his claims against JP Morgan Chase to final and binding arbitration under the terms of the parties' arbitration agreement. And though 9 U.S.C. § 3 "seems to direct that the action `shall' be stayed pending completion of arbitration," the Ninth Circuit has "held that, notwithstanding the language of § 3, a district court may either stay the action or dismiss it outright when, as here, the court determines that all of the claims raised in the action are subject to arbitration." Johnmohammadi v. Bloomingdale's, Inc., 755 F.3d 1072, 1073-74 (9th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer