Filed: Jun. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM MAY 9, 2016 TO JUNE 13, 216 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Miguel Ramirez, by and through their respective counsel of record herein, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On May 9, 2016, the parties appeared before the Court for a status conference. At that time, pursuant to the parties' request, the Court set the matter for a further status or change of plea hearing on June 13, 2016 at 2:00 p.
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM MAY 9, 2016 TO JUNE 13, 216 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Miguel Ramirez, by and through their respective counsel of record herein, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On May 9, 2016, the parties appeared before the Court for a status conference. At that time, pursuant to the parties' request, the Court set the matter for a further status or change of plea hearing on June 13, 2016 at 2:00 p.m..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM MAY 9, 2016 TO JUNE 13, 216
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Miguel Ramirez, by and through their respective counsel of record herein, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. On May 9, 2016, the parties appeared before the Court for a status conference. At that time, pursuant to the parties' request, the Court set the matter for a further status or change of plea hearing on June 13, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
2. The parties jointly stipulated to exclude the time between May 9, 2016 and June 13, 2016, from the time in which the defendant must be brought to trial pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3131 et seq. The government has produced discovery, which the defendant continues to review with his counsel. Therefore, the parties agree that the time period of May 9, 2016 to June 13, 2016, inclusive, should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i) and (h)(7)(B)(iv) on the basis that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and failing to exclude time between May 9, 2016 and June 13, 2016 would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based upon the representations of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between May 9, 2016 and June 13, 2016 would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between May 9, 2016 and June 13, 2016 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter is set before this Court on June 13, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. for a further status or change of plea hearing, and that the time between May 9, 2016 and June 13, 2016 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
